Where
do we go from here?
Counteracting these constructions of
poverty that blind us to its reality,
requires major changes in status quo.
First, better data collection methods
and ways to analyze the statistics must
be found in order to finally understand
the size as well as root of the problem
of poverty. As much as statistics are
often a theoretical plaything of academics,
if data is collected objectively and
conscientiously, statistics could be
a valuable tool to help explain where
poverty comes from. For one, knowing
the number of people poverty affects
and its real causes would help with designing
more meaningful responses to end it.
Second, and more importantly, the common outlook on poverty and perception
of the poor must change. If people’s mentality evolves so that poverty
is no longer seen as a necessary evil (the someone-will-always-be-on-the-bottom
syndrome) or as a form of natural selection of the fittest, effective pressure
can be placed on those in power to change the institutionalized approaches
to and views on poverty. This second change is directly linked to the problem
of data because there is a reciprocal relationship between what information
is made available and those who consume information. As much as people are
influenced by what they read, they can also impact on the quality of information
produced. If people become more aware about the ineffectiveness of current
anti-poverty actions and of modern ways of evaluating poverty, they will
become resensitized to poverty as a severe social problem. Only then, can
people exert pressure and bring about change.
The fact is that poverty is a violent,
systemic disease that nearly half the
world’s people suffer from. Like
with the practice of slavery, we are
desensitized to the reality of poverty.
Like it was with genocide, we have not
been able to conceptualize an effective
and regular response to the problem.
The current obsession with talking, researching,
and understanding poverty, while important
on some level, points to the inability
to grasp the real meaning and acute presence
of people living in conditions of poverty.
The focus on discussion about how much,
where and who is poor is, simply put,
a crime when it takes place in spite
of the rampant poverty that we can actually
see: on European and North American streets,
in the TV, in books, and in the rare
but nevertheless present words of those
directly affected. The challenge, however
frustrating, is that it depends on our
generations to change whether people
in 100 years will look back with scorn,
at how unresponsive we were to the presence
of poverty.
<<
Back to Page 1
|